WebIf you need to wait for an asynchronous operation inside a Task in C#, you can use the Task.WhenAll or Task.WhenAny methods to wait for the asynchronous operation to … WebAug 14, 2024 · List threads = new List (); // Add your threads to this collection threads.WaitAll (); I would rather use ThreadHelpers.WaitAll (threadCollection) .. in any case, this is largely what I use for tests. I've rarely had the need to 'wait all' in actual code. An explanation would be in order.
c# - Synchronously waiting for an async operation, and why does Wait …
WebMar 31, 2024 · Async and Await. Async and await are keywords in C# that simplify asynchronous programming. ... The await keyword is used to wait for the ReadToEndAsync operation to complete without blocking the ... WebJul 24, 2015 · You don't have to do anything special, Parallel.Foreach () will wait until all its branched tasks are complete. From the calling thread you can treat it as a single synchronous statement and for instance wrap it inside a try/catch. Update: The old Parallel class methods are not a good fit for async (Task based) programming. josh nelson t rowe price
C# await vs Task.Result in an Async Method - iditect.com
Web1 day ago · I think this is because the endpoints array is empty at the start - so whilst it waits for PopulateEndpoints to return it evaluates this second method first instead of waiting for it to complete. I have tried this but it also does not work: WebSep 9, 2012 · static async Task DoSomething(int siteId, int postId, IBlogClient client) { await client.DeletePost(siteId, postId); // call API client Console.WriteLine("Deleted post {0}.", siteId); } Using the C# 5 async/await operators, what is the correct/most efficient way to start multiple tasks and wait for them all to complete: josh neman usc cell phone