WebJan 7, 2008 · INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir.2000), the BIA erred in concluding that Fedunyak's... Grava , 205 F.3d at 1181) (holding that petitioner was eligible for asylum where he acted against corruption by rescuing two … WebJun 7, 2004 · See Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 & n. 3 (9th Cir.2000) (recognizing that "[p]urely personal retribution is, of course, not persecution on account of political opinion," but holding that "[w]hen the alleged [government] corruption is inextricably intertwined with governmental operation, the exposure and prosecution of such an abuse …
Grava v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Ninth Circuit …
WebMar 7, 2000 · 205 F.3d 1177 DIONESIO CALUNSAG GRAVA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATIONAND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 98-70981 UNITED … WebFeb 26, 2015 · Hayrapetyan v. Mukasey , 534 F.3d 1330, 1337 (10th Cir. 2008); Grava v. INS , 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000). Additionally, while there is no categorical distinction between opposition to ... (citing INS v.Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (holding that the applicant did not demonstrate ... smart device box
BEHNOOSH ASHTARI V. MERRICK GARLAND, No. 18-72355 (9th …
In Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 2000), we addressed the question of whether retaliation for the act of publicizing corruption amounts to persecution on account of a political opinion. Summary of this case from Hasan v. Ashcroft See more The Board had no basis in regulations or its own precedent to disregard Grava's written application as sworn to at the deportation hearing, … See more Grava also argues that he was denied his Fifth Amendment due process right to effective assistance of counsel in his deportation hearing because his lawyer in that proceeding … See more A remand is warranted only if Grava were prejudiced by the Board's departure from its own regulations and precedent. See United States v. Cerda-Pena, 799 F.2d 1374, 1377(9th Cir. … See more WebJul 25, 2014 · July 25, 2006, in accordance with Grava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2000). After giving the parties a final opportunity to submit briefs on the issues of the respondent’s eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal, the Immigration Judge issued an oral decision granting the respondent’s WebGrava v. INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000). We agree that, in some circumstances, opposition to state corruption may provide evidence of an alien’s political opinion or give … hilley elementary